Contents
Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge
09 August 2015 by Herb Lainchbury
Participants
- Herb Lainchbury
- Mike Linksvayer
- Aaron Wolf
Agenda
- state of OD 2.1
- OD Web Site Structure
- OD Summary Statements
- Proposal to move OD discussion to forum
- Licenses waiting for approval
- Other Issues?
Summary
- state of OD 2.1
- are we there yet?
- discuss changes
- https://github.com/okfn/opendefinition/blob/master/source/open-definition-2.1-dev.markdown
- change “available” to “provided” everywhere
- leave “should” in 1.3
- there are still 6 tickets
- Mike to add reference to RFC2119
- move the “should be compatible” to the license preamble
- OD web site structure
- main vs gh-pages
- let’s move away from master -> gh-pages
- OD Summary Statements
- three versions. we’ve settled on one.
- are there any issues with proceeding to syncrhonize them? [no]
- Proposal to move OD discussion to forum
- pros, cons, impact?
- herb will send a note giving folks a chance to raise objection, if none received then we will move
- Licenses waiting for approval
- structure - where should we store them?
- what to do with licenses that are inreview forever? (BC)
- follow FSF model - maximally compatible, open and rejected (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html)