“I’ll note from the start that the open definition doesn’t have anything to say about whether a login is permitted or not permitted.”
push to the list - is there some ambiguity - it has always been our view that requiring login is not open - do we need an FAQ or some explanation? Openable?
I’ve (Rufus) posted here :
https://discuss.okfn.org/t/login-requirements-compliant-or-not-with-open-definition/1674 and we can discuss
License Review Process Logistics
where do we log requests / mentions?
where do we maintain the list of in-review?
where do we maintain the list of those that have gone through the process?
do we maintain an archival copy? if so, where? As attachment on the forum during discussion probably at least
KOGL
ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/korea-open-government-license-kogl/899
Parliament Open License v2.0
ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/scottish-parliament-open-licence-version-2-0/1646
USA
is state and local level data automatically in the PD? Luis responded on Forum.
Plan for 2016
OSSD
Rufus: Promote 2.1 and engage publishers
Forum
Herb to announce: list to go to moderated status - done
all communications to go to forum from this point forward
