29 April 2016 by Herb Lainchbury

Participants

  • Herb Lainchbury
  • Mike Linksvayer
  • Luis Villa
  • Aaron Wolf
  • Rufus Pollock

Agenda

  • Authentication and Openness (and Open APIs)
    • this is http://opendefinition.org/ossd/index.html related
  • license review process logistics
  • KOGL
  • Scottish Parliament Open License v2.0
  • USA
  • plan for 2016

Summary

  • Authentication and Openness (and Open APIs)
    • http://blog.ldodds.com/2015/11/25/how-can-open-data-publishers-monitor-usage/
    • “I’ll note from the start that the open definition doesn’t have anything to say about whether a login is permitted or not permitted.”
    • push to the list - is there some ambiguity - it has always been our view that requiring login is not open - do we need an FAQ or some explanation? Openable?
      • I’ve (Rufus) posted here :
        • https://discuss.okfn.org/t/login-requirements-compliant-or-not-with-open-definition/1674 and we can discuss
  • License Review Process Logistics
    • where do we log requests / mentions?
    • where do we maintain the list of in-review?
    • where do we maintain the list of those that have gone through the process?
    • do we maintain an archival copy? if so, where? As attachment on the forum during discussion probably at least
  • KOGL
    • ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/korea-open-government-license-kogl/899
  • Parliament Open License v2.0
    • ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/scottish-parliament-open-licence-version-2-0/1646
  • USA
    • is state and local level data automatically in the PD? Luis responded on Forum.
  • Plan for 2016
    • OSSD
    • Rufus: Promote 2.1 and engage publishers
  • Forum
    • Herb to announce: list to go to moderated status - done
    • all communications to go to forum from this point forward
  • Action:
    • Herb to discuss Chair logistics with Luis